Search found 1731 matches
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 2:45 pm
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: Contact with Namecoin miners
- Replies: 8
- Views: 142484
Re: Contact with Namecoin miners
F2Pool's website is supposedly https://www.f2pool.com/ , but the website is currently timing out for me.
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:12 pm
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: Contact with Namecoin miners
- Replies: 8
- Views: 142484
Re: Contact with Namecoin miners
Wang Chun from F2Pool is on GitHub: https://github.com/wangchun
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 1:05 pm
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: Contact with Namecoin miners
- Replies: 8
- Views: 142484
Re: Contact with Namecoin miners
Slush can apparently be contacted via the web form at https://slushpool.com/help/contact-us/feedback .
- Mon Jun 18, 2018 12:34 pm
- Forum: Mining
- Topic: Contact with Namecoin miners
- Replies: 8
- Views: 142484
Re: Contact with Namecoin miners
I haven't authenticated this, but it looks like BTC.TOP's CEO can be reached via Twitter at https://mobile.twitter.com/jiangzhuoer .
- Wed Jun 06, 2018 4:13 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Permission to post messages: an IQ-test?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 100034
Re: Permission to post messages: an IQ-test?
having a captcha is a standard nowadays, i don't see the problem with it. unless [tinfoil-hat-on]... Personally I'd prefer Hashcash over CAPTCHAs, because CAPTCHAs tend to discriminate against users with visual disabilities. I don't know if any well-audited Hashcash implementations for forum regist...
- Wed Jun 06, 2018 4:11 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Permission to post messages: an IQ-test?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 100034
Re: Permission to post messages: an IQ-test?
Maybe stopforumspam projects ? https://www.stopforumspam.com/ https://stopforumspam.subnets.ru/ (mine) Generally I'm not a fan of IP-based blocking, because they tend to require large amounts of collateral damage to anonymizing proxies in order to actually be effective. The first project you listed...
- Wed Jun 06, 2018 4:03 am
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: WDYT about soft fork to enable some Bitcoin features
- Replies: 6
- Views: 76032
Re: WDYT about soft fork to enable some Bitcoin features
@domob: Have the following things already been thoroughly verified? P2SH rules are enforced properly for name outputs after the fork? Recognition of whether a P2SH output is a name output is unchanged before and after the fork? (1) and (2) for P2SH-wrapped SegWit outputs? (1) and (2) for pure SegWit...
- Wed Jun 06, 2018 3:50 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: A strange issue with registering domians
- Replies: 1
- Views: 37048
Re: A strange issue with registering domians
more recently I noticed that it is more frequently asking me to confirm updates. Like I don't think I had to do that at all before and then I had done it nearly a thousand times for these domains. I'm not sure I understand what confirmation dialog you're referring to. Can you please paste the exact...
- Sat Apr 28, 2018 8:31 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Permission to post messages: an IQ-test?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 100034
Re: Permission to post messages: an IQ-test?
I agree with questionmark. These stupid captcha detectors are the biggest reason I drop down and bail on using a certain website/forum. I'm open to suggestions on how to improve the situation, but calling things stupid and suggesting that you might leave the forum are not constructive suggestions. ...
- Sat Apr 28, 2018 8:25 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Why names are not encrypted?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 71792
Re: Why names are not encrypted?
So there are a few reasons why this isn't supported right now. 1. Trying to encrypt data with a low-entropy key (such as a Namecoin identifier) and then add it to an immutable ledger is generally a *really bad* idea. It's basically the equivalent of using a low-entropy password on a website, and the...