Search found 94 matches
- Mon Jul 11, 2011 7:45 pm
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: Built-in name market
- Replies: 8
- Views: 9214
Built-in name market
There was an interesting discussion on IRC started by agreenbhm which I thought deserved its own thread. Basically the idea is to allow buying and selling names for NMC through the network by introducing some new transaction types. Some examples: Buying names name_offer <name> <amount> [block_expire...
- Sun Jul 10, 2011 3:13 am
- Forum: Tools, GUI & other softwares
- Topic: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled
- Replies: 24
- Views: 22929
Re: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled (Need guinea pigs ^^
I think Firefox must auto-complete the address with a trailing "/" before forwarding to the proxy but other browsers might have different address completion behaviour so i'm gonna leave it in as an optional additional pattern here: You may be right. Here is a new xml ready to go for people that don...
- Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:45 am
- Forum: Tools, GUI & other softwares
- Topic: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled
- Replies: 24
- Views: 22929
Re: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled (Need guinea pigs ^^
LOL, totally missed that.moa wrote: You would have. I am using "Wildcards" checked ... not "Regular Expressions".
Btw, is there really a need for "*.bit"? Everything seems to be working fine just with "*.bit/*".
- Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:32 am
- Forum: Tools, GUI & other softwares
- Topic: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled
- Replies: 24
- Views: 22929
Re: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled (Need guinea pigs ^^
Weird, those patterns were the first ones I tried when trying to fix the original pattern but I got an error saying that they were not valid regular expressions.moa wrote: URL pattern "*.bit/*"
URL pattern "*.bit"
- Sun Jul 10, 2011 2:21 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: SOLUTION to the NameCoin problem
- Replies: 19
- Views: 14006
Re: SOLUTION to the NameCoin problem
Personally I'm having an extremely hard time accepting that you are an accomplished C++ programmer after you've shown yourself a complete failure at math, economics and basic common sense.
- Sun Jul 10, 2011 1:50 am
- Forum: Project direction
- Topic: Merged mining + timetravel fix @19200 - must upgrade
- Replies: 156
- Views: 190259
Re: Merged mining block number
48000 sound fine, plenty of time to get everyone on board. If there's no opposition from pool operators it could be lowered to 36000 or more. If it were up to me though I'd start on 24000~28000 since we are still months away from that range and is more than enough time in my opinion.
- Sat Jul 09, 2011 9:38 pm
- Forum: Tools, GUI & other softwares
- Topic: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled
- Replies: 24
- Views: 22929
Re: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled (Need guinea pigs ^^
Yeah, I'm getting it quite a bit too. Just waiting for that to get solved before I whore this solution in the bitcoin forums and reddit.moa wrote: hmmm, seem to be getting a lot of those when browsing other sites ... maybe not ready for prime time yet eh.
- Sat Jul 09, 2011 9:25 pm
- Forum: Tools, GUI & other softwares
- Topic: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled
- Replies: 24
- Views: 22929
Re: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled (Need guinea pigs ^^
Anybody knows how to disable FoxyProxy notifications?
- Sat Jul 09, 2011 2:52 pm
- Forum: Tools, GUI & other softwares
- Topic: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled
- Replies: 24
- Views: 22929
Re: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled (Need guinea pigs ^^
What happens with this regex if you use domains without trailing slash? I. e.: http://example.bit/ vs. http://example.bit Both work but I'll use your new pattern anyway since I don't know much about this stuff. Yeah getting this with my new pattern as well. However I don't really understand it, as ...
- Sat Jul 09, 2011 1:29 am
- Forum: Tools, GUI & other softwares
- Topic: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled
- Replies: 24
- Views: 22929
Re: 4 steps to get firefox .bit enabled (Need guinea pigs ^^
Fixed the bitcoin site problem by changing the pattern from https?://(.*\.)*bit . [/color]* to https?://(.*\.)*bit / [/color]*. I get a warning though when trying to save either of those patterns: Parentheses shouldn't be used in patterns unless matching a parenthesis literally. If you really want t...