Search found 63 matches
- Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:58 am
- Forum: Tools, GUI & other softwares
- Topic: CACert SSL for NameCoin
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3854
Re: CACert SSL for NameCoin
I think recent software supports SNI. SNI allows different certificates for a single IP.
- Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:38 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Merged Mining implementation with getmemorypool [solved]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4374
Re: Merged Mining implementation with getmemorypool [solved]
Do you have a patch to mm-proxy to use getmemorypool?
- Fri Nov 04, 2011 2:17 am
- Forum: Tools, GUI & other softwares
- Topic: Namecoin Bundle : namecoin + proxy for firefox, IE & chrome
- Replies: 9
- Views: 25656
Re: Namecoin Bundle : namecoin + proxy for firefox, IE & chr
Very nice.
Do you think merging this with Tor browser bundle will be interesting to users and the Tor project?
Do you think merging this with Tor browser bundle will be interesting to users and the Tor project?
- Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:09 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Validation bug fixed - please upgrade to nc0.3.24.64
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8715
Re: Validation bug fixed - please upgrade to nc0.3.24.64
To be clear: an immediate upgrade is required by everybody. This is not a change to the validation rules. It is a missing validation rule and that is why it has to be applied immediately. If you don't upgrade an attacker can cause you to get on an invalid fork of the chain and can rewrite the past s...
- Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:06 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Latest Namecoin Release
- Replies: 48
- Views: 44305
Re: Namecoin 3.21.90 releases [obsolete, update to 0.3.24.63
A validation bug was found by lukejr. Please see http://dot-bit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=338 . great! will this require a change to the block chain and thus an upgrade by x blocks? I would assume so. An immediate upgrade is required by everybody. This is not a change to the validation rules. I...
- Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:41 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Latest Namecoin Release
- Replies: 48
- Views: 44305
Re: Namecoin 3.21.90 releases [obsolete, update to 0.3.24.63
A validation bug was found by lukejr. Please see http://dot-bit.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=338 .
- Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:40 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Validation bug fixed - please upgrade to nc0.3.24.64
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8715
Validation bug fixed - please upgrade to nc0.3.24.64
A validation bug was found by lukejr. The code was not checking that the proof of work is attached to the parent coinbase and allowed it to be attached to any transaction. An attacker can create multiple namecoin blocks per parent block. I have a fix in my repository. khal - can you please update th...
- Tue Sep 27, 2011 2:46 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Questions for Vinced about merged mining proxy
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5602
Re: Questions for Vinced about merged mining proxy
Yes, that is correct. I thought more about performance. The pool software should already filter work submitted to the lowest chain difficulty. If that difficulty is greater than 100 almost all the submitted work will be filtered. So submitting work will not load the mm-proxy or bitcoind/namecoind. T...
- Sat Sep 24, 2011 2:13 am
- Forum: Technical Support
- Topic: Questions for Vinced about merged mining proxy
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5602
Re: Questions for Vinced about merged mining proxy
I'm going to answer some of these now and some later. I've spent the last couple of days going through all sorts of mental contortions trying to decipher the backend of merged mining. I'm finally getting a handle on it (in no small part thanks to ArtForz). I'm particularly cranky today because all t...
- Sat Sep 24, 2011 1:44 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Creating an official namecoin tree ?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5925
Re: 51% Attack - Countermeasure Roundup
So, we may have this to still be able to pull requests to bitcoin + namecoin : - bitcoin/bitcoin => forked to namecoin/namecoin => forked to other_people/namecoin This can work too. You will have to do some git hacking to overwrite the master branch with my version. I think you can delete master an...