Namecoin Forum

I vote for classic; provided that at the end of the process the logo will be available free for use by all namecoin users without restriction.

Then I think about paying $50 for 1KB of storage per a year and I question whether I should get a prescription for some anti-anxiety meds [3]. In the end I think we need to work out a way to tailor pricing, size, renewal intervals, and field content to each namespaces needs. For example, we could c...

Yeah, dealing with squatting is a hard problem. I think one important relevant question is, does ICANN have less squatting than Namecoin because (1) names are more expensive, or (2) names are not registered anonymously? I suspect the answer is both. (1) is easy to fix via a median consensus for pri...

By *his* algebra we have: 20 bytes(name) + 20 bytes(nonce) + 20 bytes(revoke) + 1 bytes(stamp) + 16 bytes(IPv6) = 77 bytes 77 * 1.9e8 = 14630000000 bytes, or 13.625GB for the *raw data*. He's estimating up for database overhead perhaps, or he was just doing the math kind of in his head and coming up...

I am having difficulty following your logic.

Would you please state what specifically problem your proposal solves, and how it solves it? What is the logical progression from problem->solution?

Thank you. It's nice to see someone else enthusiastic about namecoin.

Thanks a lot! I've been wanting to integrate something directly into my BIND servers for quite some time, and this will speed up my efforts considerably.