vinced wrote:
Please test and post feedback here.
First of all: great work! Thank you for this code. I just mangled all pieces onto one test mashine and came up with the following configuration:
Standard Phoenix Miner (phatk) || standard cpuminer -> stock github pushpoold -> merged-mine-proxy -> bitcoind && namecoind from namecoin-mergedmine
Seems to work flawless so far. I'll go and set up an alpha version of MasterPool.eu to hopefully support both blockchains soon for those who are interested in testing this code. Until now Im running without frontend. Both blockchains already generated a block on testnet
namecoind getinfo:
{
"version" : 32451,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 10354,
"connections" : 2,
"proxy" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"difficulty" : 0.19446934,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"testnet" : true,
"keypoololdest" : 1310724558,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}
namecoind listtransactions:
[
{
"account" : "",
"category" : "immature",
"amount" : 50.00000000,
"confirmations" : 1,
"txid" : "dee9959f35c53d12c8b7a986a885a7ac3b4afbb8e81a0567e3efb994a688a6a0",
"time" : 1310733218
}
]
bitcoind getinfo:
{
"version" : 32451,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 30704,
"connections" : 8,
"proxy" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"difficulty" : 502.92155041,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"testnet" : true,
"keypoololdest" : 1310725552,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}
bitcoind listtransactions:
[
{
"account" : "",
"category" : "immature",
"amount" : 50.00000000,
"confirmations" : 1,
"txid" : "2c82b8f66552085acf884016c0c036d35846c3f163f2d3d2691f690ca80bbdef",
"time" : 1310733589
}
]
vinced wrote:
How does block 24000 sound for launching this?
Whoaa... ermm... good?
I guess it is possible and more than enough time for pool operators but please give us a week or two in order to at least get an alpha version of the pools ready to see if everything is working fine. My biggest concern ATM is merged-mine-proxy. I'd really like to see the functionality added to pushpoold. Furthermore it would be great if it is possible to integrate merged mining patch into stock bitcoind.
moa wrote:So you are just going to ram this through without responding to any of the queries posted in your own thread?
Have a look at the documents. Most technical questions are answered there. The other issues need of course to be discussed. But ATM I see no major disadvantage by adding merged mining. What is your concern about it?